In December 2009, I accepted a one-semester, high school geometry, teaching
assignment to replace a teacher who retired abruptly. The students I
inherited expressed extreme frustration by their previous teacher's
instructional delivery. Many had mentally checked out of the class.
I discussed technological enhancements to instruction with the department head
and learned that the mathematics department did not integrate technology into
their curriculum. I decided to pursue the use technology in my
classroom. Other teachers were interested but felt that I was making work
for myself. I developed the Geometer's Sketchpad Resource Center and
software workshop to explain the functionality to other teachers with the goal
of persuading them to integrate the software in their curriculum.
Link to Standard The geometry curriculum used and inductive approach. Rather than
providing postulates and theorems, students derived them through pencil and
paper investigations. Often, the students would focus on the perfection
of the constructions and use of geometry tools rather than the conceptual
knowledge to be gained. After discovering a data projector in our math
storage room, I replaced the investigations created by hand with digital
constructions using Geometer's Sketchpad software. Using software to
develop constructions focused the students on the subject matter. The
students' made steady learning gains and communicated positive feelings about
the work. I decided to create a workshop for teachers that would train
them in the use of a popular and powerful geometry program, Geometer's
Sketchpad.
The Geometer's Sketchpad Resource Center web site contains several verbal and
visual elements and is strategically designed to inform teachers of the
benefits of the software. The carefully selected images that depict:
A student frustrated with textbook-based work
Smiling, engaged students working at computers 3
Screen shots of the software's application to geometry, algebra, trigonometry,
and calculus
Student-created projects
The web site also contains verbally persuasive text that:
Explains the benefits of using the software
Contains several sample lessons
Student's blog post responses to the following prompts:
How does this activity compare to the investigations you
completed in the textbook?
Which do you like better and why?
How do you like the GSP program? Is it confusing, easy to use, fun to use, etc.
What else would you like to share?
Of all of the persuasive elements, I believe that student
comments are the most powerful. Every student’s post indicated his or her
preference for computer-based investigations. Many stated that they felt they
learned more deeply using this method.
Challenges and Opportunities Although I am not an expert user of the software, there are numerous
implementation guides available from the publisher and user community.
Developing a workshop presented the opportunity for me to gain a deeper
knowledge of the software's capabilities. As I investigated the software’s
functionality, I learned of it's application to other courses taught by our
math department. It was exciting to find out that almost every teacher in
the department could replace student work done by hand with digital
representations.
I conducted an audience analysis to learn more about my new colleagues'
experiences with technology in the classroom. The survey revealed my first
challenge: 80% of teachers believed that the software would support only
students in geometry classes. Teachers' misconceptions would be a
critical hurdle. I needed to develop materials that held value for
everyone. I used this information to inform the development of visuals
and text on the workshop web site, designed for self-directed learning .
The visual and verbal information is designed to communicate the benefit of the
software for students of all skill levels in various math courses. I also
developed the framework for a face-to-face workshop that teaches the use of
basic functions of the software. I will continue to build these resources
and share them with other teachers in my district during our technology
meetings.
The design document for the workshop exemplifies effective communication as
well. I created flow charts to display the workshop content maps. I
applied guidelines for creating flowcharts explaining a process that I found
online to convey complex information in a consistent, understandable
format. I created a job aid for myself during this process to assist me
with flow chart creation in the future.
Professional and Personal Growth This project offered practice with an issue many K-12 technology coordinators
face, convincing teachers who do not enhance instruction with technology of the
benefits for their students. The teachers at this site wrote pacing
guides for their courses and planned to be on a specific page on a specific
day. They taught the entire math book, beginning to end. There was
a cultural resistance to change. The lesson learned in this project is to
show the benefits of change, and not to go in with guns blazing. I
believe that my approach was as beneficial in the process as resources I
developed. On my last day at the school a veteran teacher showed up to
secure the data projector before anyone else seized it. I also received
communication from another math teacher requesting the URL to the resource web
site I created.
References
Dick, W. & Reiser, R.A., (1996). Instructional
Planning, A Guide for Teachers (2nd ed.). Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.
National Institute of Open Schooling, (n.d). Certificate in Computer
Applications, Chapter 25. Retrieved February 2008, from http://www.nos.org/htm/basic2.htm.